🔗 Share this article

An unexpected contact on the professional network. A proposal of employment from a headhunter, probably a female agent, operating from China. The opportunity to earn around £20,000 part-time preparing a small number of geopolitical analyses for a Chinese company peppered with confidential or “insider” information. Payment in digital currency or cash favored.

It might appear clear, on this telling, that something about this approach would be suspicious. Nevertheless, China’s powerful intelligence agency still considers it valuable to deploy recruitment consultants to try it – prompting MI5 to warn repeatedly about their operations online.

Massive Contact Attempts on Professional Networks

In 2023, MI5 chief Ken McCallum stated operatives from China were contacting UK citizens on the platform on an unprecedented scale, at a frequency of ten thousand over the previous two and a half years, attempting to obtain governmental, commercial, defense and scientific secrets. But a new initiative aimed at politicians and Westminster has led the spy agency to take further action.

An espionage alert was issued on this week via the administrative teams of the Commons speaker and his House of Lords equivalent: a single slide after the repeated efforts of Shirly Shen and Amanda Qiu to contact Members of Parliament, peers, their staffers, economic experts, thinktanks – anybody who might become a source.

Security Strategy and Legislative Updates

In the curious manner of British intelligence, there was no publication of the protective guidance from MI5 or the interior ministry. Yet the agency knew its briefing note would become public once it was sent electronically out to parliament. Republishing it in the press helps the wider public better identify communications with a deceptive intent.

The alert has the effect of flushing out more information from within Westminster, although that is not MI5’s main objective. The agency aims for people in public life to understand that just because exchanges on LinkedIn are less overtly risky as on X or Facebook, it doesn't imply they are completely safe.

Nor is domestic spy agency believed to have been reacting to a particular event in the legislature, although the recent actions occur after the awkward failure of the legal case of a former parliamentary aide Christopher Cash and his associate Christopher Berry on a technicality earlier in the autumn.

The two had been accused of working for the foreign power – a allegation they rejected – but failure to complete a trial under the now repealed previous legislation resulted in warnings that the UK's political system had been left unprotected.

Updated Legislation and China's Long-Term Interests

The law has now been changed, and the MI5 slide contains a note of its replacement: “Those engaging in spying operations risk substantial legal consequences under the new security law.” It is a criminal offense if somebody engages in conduct that is or is likely to “materially assist a overseas spy agency”.

A natural question, though, is what Beijing has to gain. An elected representative who is outside ministerial roles will have limited access of classified material, and an associate of theirs even less. But Beijing is also interested in parliament: for a period, in 2020 and 2021, the UK’s approach to China on issues such as the telecom firm or the Uyghur repression or genocide was being influenced by MPs.

Cultural Differences and Persistent Digital Threats

To a degree there are cultural differences as well. Autocratic regimes like Beijing's export information gathering methods and the scale of its intelligence apparatus is vast, engaging 300,000 individuals. A former US official, a American cybersecurity head under president Joe Biden, commented it was sometimes estimated that “the Chinese have greater linguistic capacity involved in this than we [western intelligence] have personnel with language skills”.

Beijing is willing to develop people over the long term and sometimes even the intelligence services have struggled to differentiate legitimate relationships and espionage. “Beijing has a low threshold for what information is deemed to be useful,” security minister Dan Jarvis told MPs on Wednesday, but a sudden turn in the political cycle may mean an individual rapidly peripheral becomes important.

An alternative perspective to think about the continuous activities at secret information gathering is in the broader framework of the geopolitical contest between Beijing and the west at a threshold below the point of direct conflict. China has stepped up its hacking efforts, with the one campaign penetration of communications systems in 80 countries, and the another operation compromise of millions internet devices.

Beijing is involved in persistent attempts to find secret informants on UK politics via digital means because it wants to be provocative, to display influence and because it has the capability.